Monday, September 30, 2024
Sunday, September 29, 2024
Old World Structures - The Palace in Dallas?
Saturday, September 28, 2024
Friday, September 27, 2024
Thursday, September 26, 2024
Wednesday, September 25, 2024
Sage of Quay® Dispatch now MIRRORED on SUBSTACK
Federal Court Rules That Fluoridation Chemicals Pose An "Unreasonable Risk" To Health
[Source] History has been made. After 7 years of pursuing legal action against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over the risk posed to the developing brain by the practice of water fluoridation, the United States District Court of the Northern District of California has just ruled on behalf of the Fluoride Action Network and the plaintiffs in our precedent-setting court case. A U.S. Federal court has now deemed fluoridation an "unreasonable risk" to the health of children, and the EPA will be forced to regulate it as such. The decision is written very strongly in our favor, and we will share it in its entirety tomorrow. Below is an excerpt from the introduction of the ruling:
"The issue before this Court is whether the Plaintiffs have established by a preponderance of the evidence that the fluoridation of drinking water at levels typical in the United States poses an unreasonable risk of injury to health of the public within the meaning of Amended TSCA. For the reasons set forth below, the Court so finds. Specifically, the Court finds that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligrams per liter (“mg/L”) – the level presently considered “optimal” in the United States – poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children..the Court finds there is an unreasonable risk of such injury, a risk sufficient to require the EPA to engage with a regulatory response... One thing the EPA cannot do, however, in the face of this Court’s finding, is to ignore that risk."
In this moment, I want to recognize attorney Michael Connett for pursuing this case and leading the effort every step of the way. He's a true superhero to all of us here at FAN. Many other amazing team members were also involved in making this a reality and deserve great appreciation and thanks, including our co-plaintiffs and all of you who donated and spread the word about our case. Take a moment to celebrate this momentous occasion tonight, wherever you are. After 7 years, we all deserve it.
Read more...
Tuesday, September 24, 2024
The Subliminal Satanic Symbolism Cursing Australia
Nasal Flu Vax
Monday, September 23, 2024
Sunday, September 22, 2024
Saturday, September 21, 2024
Friday, September 20, 2024
150+ Bilderbergers Who Controlled Covid19 Pandemic Response
Thursday, September 19, 2024
Diddy goes DOWN for Sick Sex Trafficking Ring
Wednesday, September 18, 2024
Mike Williams at The Truth Telethon - Hypnosis and the Media
Tell Tale Signs of an MK Ultra Assassin
James Perloff - Here Are My 9/11 Tweets that Twitter/X Suppressed
According to Microsoft Edge’s AI tool, Copilot, the number of views an un-retweeted Tweet gets should equal about 15-20% of the person’ followers. Screenshot:
Based on this, since I have over 25,400 followers, I should be getting around 4,000 to 5,000 views on average—many more if a posting is retweeted.
However, my un-retweeted Tweets are pretty consistently limited to from 170 to 220 views. In other words, as soon they hit around 200 views, Twitter/X automatically shuts them off, preventing them from being further seen in the feeds of my followers.
Read more...
Tuesday, September 17, 2024
Monday, September 16, 2024
BANNED by YOUTUBE: Dr. Joye - Beguiled Eden to Armageddon (Feb 2015)
The Giant Disclosure - Full Documentary
Sunday, September 15, 2024
Mike Williams (Original Music) 🎵 Late Night Loving 🎵
Why Are Bands Mysteriously Disappearing?
Charlie Robinson - The Octopus of Global Control (2018)
Saturday, September 14, 2024
Friday, September 13, 2024
Thursday, September 12, 2024
Wednesday, September 11, 2024
AARP Propaganda
Tuesday, September 10, 2024
Monday, September 9, 2024
Sunday, September 8, 2024
The Bra-Breast Cancer Conspiracy: Have Women Been Hoodwinked
[Source] Presently, Americans spend roughly 20 billion dollars a year on bras,12 which is remarkable given that prior to a century ago (the 1910s, to be precise13), almost no one wore them (whereas now between 80% to 90% of women do).
In turn, almost every woman assumes bras are something women have always worn and are not aware of the massive marketing campaign the fashion industry did to normalize this practice (which was essentially done as a pivot because they could no longer sell corsets to women).14
Since women have never worn bras for most of human history, it raises a simple question. Might there be any downsides to the practice?
Read more...
Saturday, September 7, 2024
Friday, September 6, 2024
Pandemic Babies and Polio Peace
Thursday, September 5, 2024
Wednesday, September 4, 2024
Tuesday, September 3, 2024
The Overpopulation Theory That Fell Flat