Every creator who steps outside the mainstream eventually gets the same batch of oddball comments and "gotcha" questions. Here are six of the ones I see most often related to my Beatles research. Thought it would be fun to answer them straight up.
1) Question/Comment: Are you a “flat earther”?
My Response:
I’m a geocentrist — that’s the term I use. I haven’t evangelized it, I don’t push it in my content, and I don’t tie it to anything else I research. The point is simple: it has zero relevance to my Beatles work.
Interestingly, Lucian Black — an avowed Luciferian — argues in his book The Soulificati: Secrets of the Soular System and Conscious Evolution that the heliocentric model, as presented to the general public, is not its true representation. He describes it as a symbolic depiction of the Luciferian concept of soul development: the soul begins its journey with Pluto in an unconscious state and then migrates through each planet, which acts as a portal of learning and conscious evolution. The ultimate goal is to reach the Sun — the “light” — which represents Lucifer, the light bearer. I found his symbolic interpretation insightful, but once again, none of this has anything to do with the evidence on the Beatles.
People throw the “Flat Earther” label around as a cheap way to avoid dealing with the actual evidence — the impossible recording timelines, the use of ghostwriters and session musicians, the Tavistock connections, the cultural engineering angle, and all the contradictions in the official story. My research on the Beatles stands or falls on its own merits: hundreds of slides, interviews, documents, and logistical impossibilities that anyone can examine. You can disagree with me on cosmology, religion, politics, or anything else and still look at the Beatles material with clear eyes. Guilt by association is lazy thinking. Address the evidence or don’t — but don’t pretend a label on one unrelated topic magically disproves the other.
