[By James Perloff] This post is a sequel to my “Debunking Myself” post, in which I explain why—based upon accumulated evidence—I abandoned the “no planes” theory of 9/11 and rescinded a theory I had proposed. (A significant number of revisions have since been made to that post.)
However, many anomalies remain concerning 9/11. Although the fiercest controversy continues to swirl about the manner in which the Twin Towers were destroyed, this article will continue to confine focus on the planes and related phenomena. For that reason, this post should be considered a continuation of the previous one. While I do believe that planes were indeed used on 9/11, and that there were flights numbered American 11, United 175, American 77, and United 93, we’ll now proceed to review anomalies that persist with these flights.
My intention here is to present facts as an attorney would in a courtroom. I wish to avoid speculation as much as possible, but where an aberration in the official story occurs, I will sometimes suggest a possible explanation.
Before proceeding, I wish to acknowledge some of the 9/11 researchers who, among many, have helped me over the years:
Read more...
